poly-pillsHow many people do you know who routinely take more than one medication? More than two? Now, look in your own medicine cabinet and read the labels. How many medications do you have that each contains acetaminophen or ibuprofen? Taking multiple medications and multiple medications containing the same ingredients are two examples of polypharmacy.

Polypharmacy literally means “many medications,” and although it may mean the deliberate use of multiple medications to treat multiple conditions, it may also represent the unnecessary prescribing and use of more medications than are clinically indicated, the simultaneous use of the same medication in multiple forms, or any unnecessary medication in a prescribed regimen (Rounds et al., 2013). Polypharmacy can result in falls, changes in cognition and a variety of adverse events in older adults.

In older adults, the use of medications – even those that are indicated – is a balancing act. A change in the aging body’s physiology and how the body uses, distributes, and excretes drugs means that the older adult is at greater risk for unanticipated and often preventable side effects. In addition to changes in physiology, several other things increase the risk for polypharmacy including: 1) multiple co-morbid conditions, 2) poor adherence to medication regimens, 3) multiple prescribers, 4) prescribers with inadequate knowledge of geriatrics, and 5) self-medication or sharing of medications (Rounds et al. 2013).

Several strategies can be used to reduce polypharmacy and the associated risks of inappropriate medication use in older adults. For health professionals, careful assessment of medications is the first step. Ask patients to bring all of their medications with them when they have clinic visits. Some call this the “paper bag” test – put all the medicines in a bag and bring them along. Also, be suspicious of changes in behavior or function in an older adult. Medications should be near the top of the list of possible causes of an abrupt change. Finally, the Beers Criteria for Inappropriate Medication Use (AGS, 2012) is an excellent resource for prescribing. These criteria are an easy-to-use  list of medications and include those that are potentially inappropriate, drugs that should be used with caution, and those that should be avoided in the presence of certain diseases.

Whether you are an older adult, a family member, or a health care professional, you need to be vigilant about medication use in older adults. Knowledge and coordination of care can greatly enhance well-being and avoid the potentially dangerous consequences of polypharmacy.

References

  1. American Geriatrics Society Beers Expert Panel (2012). AGS Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. http://americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/clinical_practice/clinical_guidelines_recommendations/2012
  2. Rounds, L., Rappaport, B. & Mallary, L. (2013). Polypharmacy in Senior Adults. American Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(1/2), 7-10+.

Our Guest Blogger this week is Linda R. Rounds, PhD, RN, FNP, Professor, UTMB School of Nursing.

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

Hume Cronyn and Jessica Tandy in Cocoon

Hume Cronyn and Jessica Tandy in Cocoon

At the Super Bowl one of the fancy commercials was about a group of elderly people out for a wild night on the town.

Taco bell released the commercial on YouTube hoping it would go viral. According to Time Magazine by the day after the Super Bowl 2013 it had been viewed about 1.2 million times and shared 130,000 times (Sanburn, 2013). So, I guess it did.

Why did Taco Bell make this commercial? From their web site, “‘There’s a common misconception that to appeal to Millennials you have to show Millennials.  The reality is to appeal to them you simply need to entertain and engage them.  And that’s what this entire integrated effort does,’ said Mike Sheldon, CEO of Deutsch LA.  Sheldon continues, ‘We’ve all had an epic night out on the town followed by a trip to Taco Bell. Viva Young is a surprising and fresh way to remind people of that.’”

So it’s not a commercial made to appeal to the older generation, nor an homage to how the elderly can still be a part of mainstream life, no, it’s marketing to twenty year olds.

Now, I do admit to finding the commercial amusing, but a few questions do come to mind:

  • Was this something older people would enjoy watching?
  • Did it help to improve the image of growing older in America?
  • Is it respectful of older people?
  • Does it mask some deeper rejection of the idea of growing older, mature and wise?

The commercial also reminds me of the film Cocoon. In that film a group of old people swim in a pool that makes them vigorous and vital again. Cocoon makes two points. First, it’s always good to be healthy, strong and seek new adventures. Second, the true meaning of life may come from following the seasons of life.

References

  1. Cocoon (film). Internet Movie Database: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088933
  2. Live Mas/Viva Young (commercial): a52: https://vimeo.com/58518122
  3. Sanburn, J. Time, Business & Money, Feb. 04, 2013.  http://business.time.com/2013/02/05/super-bowl-2013s-6-most-shared-commercials-and-why-they-went-viral/slide/6-taco-bells-viva-young/#ixzz2StcM2v4Z
  4. Super Bowl web site: http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/47
  5. Taco Bell web site: http://www.tacobell.com/Company/newsreleases/SUPER_BOWL_Sneak_Peek+

Image source: http://hippierefugee.blogspot.com/2012/12/cocoon-return_11.html

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

commander codyI recently came across an article on “6 predictions for our digital future” written by CNN’s Doug Gross. It outlined the predictions made by Google chairman, Eric Schmidt,  in a new book “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business,”  The article and book centered on what the “world will be like when everyone on Earth is connected digitally.”  It is Mr. Schmidt’s belief that this will happen by the end of the current decade.

That is only 7 years away, folks.  So, I ask – are you and everyone you know ready to be connected digitally, if you aren’t already.

Around the same time I was listening to John Mellencamp’s song “Peaceful World” and the line… “If you’re not part of the future, then get out of the way.”

I saw some new threads begin to intertwine between these two thoughts – “the future is digital and if you’re not part of it, then should you get out of the way?”  And what exactly does that mean as we age? Will playing bridge be done using Skype or will we start playing digital bingo?  Ok, maybe those stereotypes of what older folks like to do will have faded by then.  But what about the reality of aging and the issues we may face as we age? Fixed income? Changing physical and mental health? Loss of friends and family?  You have to wonder how the expected and increasing fast pace of living in a digital world will effect quality of life of an older adult who wants to relax and enjoy the fruits of retirement.  Is slowing down the expected path as we age and that if it doesn’t fit in a digital world? Or will embracing the digital world add untold joys to post-retirement lifestyles?

I remember about 15 years ago, offering computer classes at the local senior center and the absolute look of amazement on the faces of seniors fascinated by what they saw and could do on a PC. Of course, there were those who grumbled and would predict, “all this computer stuff will never catch on.”  Well, I guess we know that hasn’t exactly been the case.

So I try to think how I might face a digital world in the next 10 years.  I used to think it would be no problem keeping up with the latest technological trends and gadgets.  I bought a laptop, joined Facebook, got the latest iPhone, I’m good at texting, know how to Skype and can hold my own with videoconferencing at work.  But I haven’t embraced Twitter, E-bay nor do I have wireless Internet service or cable TV.  I use an amplified antenna to get local TV stations since I don’t like cable companies.  So I feel a little behind in some things and once you fall behind, at the pace of new technology, catching up may be impossible – and expensive.

So the next question for myself is – how much does it matter if I “don’t keep up” with all this technology?  Will it affect my longevity?  My quality of life? Will my friends abandon me if I don’t know the latest in tech?  Will I be able to continue to communicate with the world?  With my kids as they become more techno savvy?  Generally, I hope we will do the best we can, get into what is comfortable – separate the “wheat from the chafe” kind of attitude.  Maybe we will continue to know when something is important to pursue, learn and enhance it with all our aging wisdom.  I don’t think the goal of aging is to keep up with the latest trends or even to establish new ones.  I hope the goal will be to stay happy and healthy with whatever we undertake and make it a part of improving ourselves, our minds, bodies, and relationships – if we chose it to be.

References

The Guest Blogger this week is Tony DiNuzzo, Ph.D., Director, ETGEC-C, UTMB Sealy Center on Aging.

Image Source: “Commander Cody and his Lost Planet Airmen” album cover. https://www.asme.org/kb/news—articles/articles/technology-and-society/engineering-rock-star

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

 

Your-Kitchen-Your-Herbal-PhLast month I was at the Annual Herbal Forum at Round Top. This is a gathering of people, from across Texas, who grow and use herbs in cooking and for health benefits. I use herbs in cooking but there is a very long tradition for the beneficial uses of herbs for curing aliments, preventing illness and maintaining wellness. I’m going to spend an occasional week, here and there, on exploring an herb or two as they relate to the rural elderly.

The use of herbs and plants in healing and wellness is the oldest approach in medicine. Early people discovered that leaves, bark, sap and other parts of plants helped in healing cuts and curing maladies. The average person today would not recognize the “pharmacy” of the 17th century which was filled with dried plants and other natural items which were ground into the various medicinal powders. As medicine evolved,  practitioners developed purified chemicals and the use of prepared pills became our common mode. Today, there is a gulf of perception between a bottle of aspirin and a box of peppermint leaves, but both are used to reduce the discomfort of a headache.

Three assertions. First, we may generally acknowledged that the use of homemade remedies and herbs is more common in rural communities and among the older population who may be more familiar with local traditions of self-care. Second, the validity of a herb for any particular use usually lacks a systematic history of clinical trials to verify its utility and effectiveness. Third, modern health care providers have been slow to return to using herbs because of concerns about the difficulty in predicting exactly how a natural product may effect a patient.

A consequence of these assertions is that often patients use herbs to treat themselves and others and if the health care provider is not aware of this, his/her treatments may interact negatively with what the patient is doing. Thus, it behooves care providers to be aware of herbal health practices,  find out if patents are using them and plan their interventions accordingly.

This can get complicated. For example, Echinacea is commonly used as a preventative measure for colds or as an intervention to reduce the severity of a cold. However, there are two varieties of Echinacea and each has somewhat different properties and uses (Brinker, 2013). The article by Brinker reviews historical uses and clinical trials with Echinacea angustifola root extracts and Echinacea purpurea fresh plant extracts. They each are good for helping to resolve different health issues, but there is also overlap between the varieties and varying levels of effectiveness depending on the exact source and processing. Thus, the modern care provider needs not only to find out what his/her patients are doing for self-care, but he/she needs to be aware of subtle differences between varieties of the same thing.

Reference

Brinker, F. Echinacea: Differences Matter. HerbalGram, February/April 2013, issue 97, pp 46-57. The HerbalGram is a journal published by the American Botanical Council (www.herbalgram.org) which is a good source for herbal and botanical information.

Image Source: http://www.bitlessbridle.co.uk

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

Microsoft Office image (2013)

Microsoft Office image (2013)

Once upon a time, researchers focused on survival as the gold standard outcome for life.  While mortality continues to be a critical measure, concepts related to quality of life are integral to many health care professions.

As a physical therapist, I work with patients to develop functional goals that are linked to participation in life.  During a literature search (most likely for something unrelated), I became curious about the emergence of different life measurement terms in research.  I searched for the oldest article titles in Pub Med (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) that included each term and found:

  • Mortality (1841)
  • Quality of life (1959)
  • Successful aging (1967)
  • Active life expectancy (1983)

From a measurement perspective, death is a concrete event; successful aging is abstract.  Abstract concepts are inherently challenging to define and quantify.  Terminology and operational definitions for successful aging are diverse.  Measures of success may focus on physical ability/disability, cognitive function, emotional or social health, disease, or combinations of different health domains (Lowry, 2012).

What is wrong with different definitions?  Basic epidemiologic measures such as prevalence prove problematic.  The range for “mean proportion of successful agers” across 28 studies was “0.4% to 95%” (Lowry, 2012).

So is successful aging a public health issue?  Do older adults view successful aging differently than health care providers?  Reichstadt et al. (2010) conducted qualitative interviews on perceptions of “successful aging” with 22 community-dwelling older adults.  Themes included balance between “self-acceptance/self-contentment” and “engagement with life/self-growth in later life.”

Discussion Questions

  • Share your own definition of successful aging.
  • What other terms are used for quality of aging in your community or health care setting? How is the outcome measure defined?

References

  1. Lowry KA, Vallejo AN, Studenski SA. Successful aging as a continuum of functional independence: lessons from physical disability models of aging. Aging Dis 2012;3:5-15.
  2. Reichstadt J, Sengupta G, Depp CA, Palinkas LA, Jeste DV. Older adults’ perspectives on successful aging: qualitative interviews. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18:567-575.

Our Guest Blogger this week is Rebecca Galloway, PT, GCS, CEEAA, Assistant Professor,  SHP Department of Physical Therapy.

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

Do you have experience with diagnostic error?  Have you ever brought your car or computer to be fixed and you get it back and it seems like the problem starts happening again after a few days?  You have probably encountered diagnostic error with numerous patients and you (and they) may have never known.  Diagnostic error can include over-diagnosis, misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis, or severely delayed diagnosis.

If you are a person who provides diagnoses, chances are you have been part of a diagnostic error and not even known it.  Consider trying to track your diagnostic accuracy to see how well you are actually treating your patients.  Try a follow-up phone call and simply ask them if they think you identified their root problem. Also, consider these diagnosis myths as you take a good look at your own practice.

If you are not responsible for diagnosing, tell your patients about the potential problem and consider advocating for them… especially the ones who have been led to believe “it’s all in their head.”

Diagnosis Myths from a Patient’s Perspective

  • “No news is good news” – make sure you follow-up with lab results.
  • “The more tests I have, the better accuracy of my diagnosis” – explain why this isn’t always the case.
  • “My doctors are talking to one another” – remind your patients of their role in their health care coordination.

Diagnostic Myths from a Provider’s Perspective

  • “I don’t have any diagnostic error problems” – take a closer look.
  • “Reimbursement doesn’t change my behavior” – take a closer look again.
  • “I always do a complete differential diagnosis” – are you sure?

It’s always good to take a look at our practice and make sure we are providing the best possible diagnostic care for our patients.  Are you?

Our Guest Blogger this week is Meredith Masel, PhD, MSW, Oliver Center for Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag

Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Good_the_bad_and_the_ugly_poster.jpg

No bedUpon admission to hospital Mrs. Murphy, age 81, lays down comfortable in bed and is reluctant to get up.  “I am in the hospital because I am ill and I need to stay in bed and be cared for,” she says.  “I need to rest and regain my strength and get well.”

The myth that bed rest is good for you is strongly ingrained in our society.  A study BY Hirshch (1990) on patients over the age of 74 noted that  by the second day of admission statistically significant deterioration had occurred in “individual scores for mobility, transfer, toileting, feeding and grooming.

Many older adults become dependent in one or more activities of daily living (ADLs: dressing, bathing, transferring, eating, toileting) when hospitalized and their prognosis after discharge is poor.

A study by Boyd and Landefeld (2008) showed that at 12 months after discharge, of those discharged with new or additional ADL disability, 41.3% died, 28.6% were alive but had not recovered to baseline function, and 30.1% were at baseline function. Hospitalization and bed rest superimpose factors such as enforced immobilization, dehydration, accelerated bone and muscle loss, urinary incontinence and sensory deprivation. Any of these factors may begin the downward cascade into a state of irreversible functional decline.

The factors that contribute to a cascade to dependency are identifiable and can be avoided. Health care providers need to encourage mobility and independence be teaching their patients about the detrimental effects of bed rest.  The Bed is not your patients friend.

Look at the patient lying in bed
What a pathetic picture he makes
The blood clotting in his veins
The lime draining from his bones
The scybala stacking up in his colon
The flesh rotting from his sweat
The urine leaking from his distended bladder
And the spirit evaporating from his soul

Poem by Richard Asher, MD

Our guest blogger this week is Bronia Michejenko, RN, MSN, GNP, BC.

References

Boyd. C., Landefeld. C. Counsell S., Pammer.  R.  (2008) Recovery of activities of daily living in older adults after hospitalization for acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc., 2008, 56(12), 2171–2179.

Hirsch. C. (1990). The natural history of functional mobility in hospitalized older patients. J. Am Geriatr. Soc., 38(12), 1296-1303.

Join us for a real-time discussion about questions raised by this essay on Wednesday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. See Discussion and SL tabs above for details. Link to the virtual meeting room: http://tinyurl.com/cjfx9ag.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.